|Man Without Qualities|
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Contra 1994 V: Democrats Don't Do Libraries Anymore?
James Taranto comments:
E.J. Dionne, a liberal Washington Post columnist, is unhappy about last week's California election results. No, not the Republican victory in the special House election (though he's none too pleased with that), but the defeat of a pair of ballot measures (emphasis his):Taranto makes a lot of sense, of course. But I think the observations in my previous post in this series regarding Prop 82 apply equally well to the failure of Prop 81 (the library bond measure): Republicans (at least those out of government) are less enthusiastic about more debt and public spending on "small government" grounds, preferring such things to be handled more by private means. And perhaps, as Dionne argues, liberals (or "progressives") ought to favor more library spending on principle or political consistency grounds. But there is good reason to think that relatively fewer Democrats care about or have children now (Taranto has, of course, noted this fact in other contexts), and children would be the main users of those libraries, as USA Today reports:The truly sobering news for liberals was in the statewide voting. Proposition 82, the ballot measure that would have guaranteed access to preschool for all of California's 4-year-olds, went down to resounding defeat, 61 to 39 percent.... [T]he column got us to thinking about broader trends that may be feeding public skepticism about government.
In Seattle, there are nearly 45% more dogs than children. In Salt Lake City, there are nearly 19% more kids than dogs. ... It's not that people in a progressive city such as Seattle are so much fonder of dogs than are people in a conservative city such as Salt Lake City. It's that progressives are so much less likely to have children.The news is even worse for Mr. Dionne and his pro-library funding sympathies because some studies have found that the children of liberals read less than children of conservatives, with the liberal children playing more computer games and watching more television than their conservative counterparts. Worse, some studies also suggest that children who play computer games to excess are more disposed to violence than their parents - with the effect on the children apparently detectable in their brains.
Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
I have a christening site/blog. It pretty much covers christening related stuff.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)
Hey, did you know that most of your comments to your blog are advertisers trying to sell something and have nothing of substance to say? P.S. I am a a Liberal/Democrat/Progressive and I have a wife and a five-year-old son. You don't cite a study on liberal children's reading habits or anything substantive regarding who is having children. USA Today is your source? Nice paper, but hardly scientific. Most of the conservatives I know actually have small families. One in particular- a Catholic Republican- made fun of my wife for "being so domestic". Go figure. Also the link to the supposed study on violence linked to video games doesn't work. That is also a specious arguement because not all video games are violent. So do non-violent video games cause violent behavior in liberal children also?Post a Comment